Free Essay Sample «Healthcare Delivery Systems»

«Healthcare Delivery Systems»

Similarities Between Various Healthcare Delivery Systems

The common measures are often used in the healthcare systems all over the countries. The GDP and per capital expenditure are some of the common measures applicable in all nations.  Devolution, delegation and decentralization are the common methods of provision of the healthcare system in most countries. The common objective is to enhance accessibility of quality services to the citizens of a given country. Some roles are delegated to lower administrative units, while the core medical functions are left with the referral hospitals. The measure of efficiency in the provision of healthcare delivery services is a relative issue. Different experts give different opinions in regard to the measure of efficiency. There is a common objective in regard to the provision of services in all nations’ .The collection of births and deaths are also similar in all nations (Oxford, 1991).

There are various healthcare delivery systems. The systems include the Jewish delivery healthcare system and the US systems. It also varies from country to country.  The differences between the systems are on the basis of healthcare expenditure, life expectancy, prenatal mortality, infant mortality, and other available statistics. The existing differences call for medical intervention to secure the situation in the different places. Every country aims to provide affordable healthcare to the citizens. The common measures are applicable to all nations. The US is interested in other countries healthcare expenditure. Every nation has interest in quality healthcare system. It is prudent to provide decent medical care to the citizens. The provision of medical care is also decentralized to the private sector. Some of the services are given by the private healthcare providers. The services include insurance schemes and wholesome healthcare coverage.

Differences Between Various Healthcare Delivery Systems

There are different healthcare expenditures in different countries. The US healthcare expenditure is around $2, 354 while the healthcare expenditure in Canada is $1, 6833. The US is the greatest investor in the healthcare delivery system. Poor healthcare expenditure ought to call for sufficient funds in the sector. Another measure in the system is life expectancy. It is highest in Netherlands. The morbidity rate is a good measure of the delivery system around the world.  There are also differences in the reporting of deaths and births. The level of reliance in mortality differs from one country to another. The systems have flaws in the rule and regulations governing the healthcare provision. For instance, in the US there is provision for devolution of some services. The devolved services are half authorized or delegated to low level administrative units. This is to reduce burdening of the central healthcare system in the country. The common difference is the escalation of the cost of healthcare in some nations. Some countries like   Netherlands provide universal healthcare to the citizens, while the US provides differential healthcare to the citizens. The mode of reforms of the healthcare system is different in every nation. Reforms can take the form of expenditure or the provision of services to the common people. The priorities level also differs in every country. The USA prioritizes the provision of basic healthcare to all citizens, while the Canadian government prioritizes the provision of specialized treatment to the citizens.

The desire to reform the healthcare systems depends on the change of lifestyles and dynamisms in technological advancement. There is a need to adopt relevant technology in everyday’s treatment. The nature of provision of healthcare in the developed nations also is either public provision or the provision through the private system. This is similar even with the young economies in the world. The private sector is a major player in the provision of the healthcare in the US. Canada prefers the provincial administration system. This is a significant difference. The Canada system is a good example of devolution, while the US system is a good example of decentralization of services by the government. 

The access to healthcare ought to be a right in some countries and a privilege in other countries. The cost of healthcare in the US is relatively high. The access is only available to the rich who can afford the high prices. The decision to raise taxes, so as to provide medical care to the people, is a poor indicator of inequity in the society. A wide scheme ought to be provided to fund the healthcare system in a given nation. This will promote equitable provision of services of the citizens. Cultural differences among countries do influence the provision of the healthcare systems in a country. This is common in the western countries with strong cultural beliefs and lifestyles. Most of the common diseases are as a result of poor lifestyles and eating habits among the people of a country. Cultural difference is clear between the Swedish and the American people. 

The Goals or Philosophies of the Various Healthcare Delivery Systems

The basic goal of the different healthcare systems is to produce or provide quality delivery and healthcare to the people of a given nation. The second goal is to minimize the mortality rate in the country. The third goal is to provide affordable healthcare system to all people. There is a need to establish a universal healthcare system (Grummet, 1989). A good government needs to have a comprehensive healthcare system for the people it governs. This will ease the burden of governance.

Mission or Philosophy Statement

My mission is to create a universal healthcare delivery system accessible and affordable to all people. The decision to choose this mission is due to the nature of medical care in many countries. The access to medical care ought to be a right, not a privilege to the citizens. Society inequity is not the right yardstick in the provision and access of healthcare services. Regardless of the social standing of the individual in the society, healthcare access is a right. We ought not to skew of healthcare to the few people who can afford it. The poor in the society have a right to live a long life. Poverty also exposes most citizens to many ailments. 



Our Customers' Testimonials

Current status


Preparing Orders


Active Writers


Support Agents

Order your 1st paper and get discount Use code first15
We are online - chat with us!