The Social Security Administration remains one of the independent agency bodies that cater for the provision of social services to the populace (Milakovich & Gordon, 2013). The services are classified as social insurance programs and include retirement, disability, and survivors’ benefits. To qualify for any service, people remit a monthly contribution to the program. The claimant’s benefits vary depending on an individual monthly income (Milakovich & Gordon, 2013). Individuals suffering from disabilities, those who have retired, and those seeking survivors benefits can qualify for the above programs (Milakovich & Gordon, 2013). Eligibility for the social insurance program under the Social Security Administration may be provided under special circumstances in case it has been proven beyond rational doubt that an individual is in need of the service. As such, all claimants should meet the criteria established by the Social Service Administration. In addition, they should provide all the necessary documentation; otherwise, the application is also denied. There is an increase in cases where people are denied benefits and they seek the assistance of disability advocates. Thus, the following paper reviews and analyzes the case of Vince Rogov who has on several occasions been denied disability benefits.
As mentioned above, Vince Rogov was denied disability benefits and took his case to Mike Lawrence, a disability advocate. His medical history showed various medical conditions such as a history of cardiac arrest, as well as hypertension and back problems (Cropf, 2015). Moreover, Vince had a high probability of suffering from a mental disorder. However, the mental disorder had not been diagnosed by a medical professional and, therefore, the symptoms may be viewed as being hearsay unless substantive claims are proven by a professional.
At this point, it should be underlined that recently, there has been an increase in backlog cases concerning disability claims to a point that the proof of medical condition is needed from all individuals seeking such services. The backlog in the number of cases is probably caused by the increase in the number of individuals who have no evidence to prove their current disability status (Cropf, 2015). Moreover, any application from any individual undergoes a long and strenuous process and is initially reviewed by the Disability Determination Service that is present in each state (Cropf, 2015). All applicants are also supposed to show that they have an employent history with a minimum number of years according to their age so that their monthly contribution could be calculated (Milakovich & Gordon, 2013). The disability is also expected to have lasted for twelve months before the application for the benefits (Social Security Administration, 2014). Additionally, all individuals who want to receive benefits are required to have been affected by the disability to a point that they can no longer be employed in any occupation. Thus, if applicants are still earning any form of income from any form of employment, they are not eligible for the above program (Social Security Administration, 2014).
The applicants are also required to face the Social Security Administration panel once they pass the Disability Determination Service process (Cropf, 2015), which is another arduous procedure. Both mentioned processes are long and difficult, and they are characterized by a strict scrutiny in regards to all documents that have been provided. Furthermore, some individuals have been denied the benefits due to resource constraints and political pressure and, therefore, most applications are likely to be denied (Milakovich & Gordon, 2013). Thus, in the given case, Rogov had gone through the process mentioned above, as he had already been declined benefits by the Social Security Administration several times, and he is appealing an earlier decision that had been made.
Mike’s investigation into the health status of Vince revealed several mental problems while Vince was still serving in Iraq. Vince reported having difficulties in building relationships with other people in the army, though he was already a first class private official (Cropf, 2015). These observations were mentioned to have lasted for more than a year, which was well documented in the Veteran Administration Office. Moreover, after arranging a meeting with an administrative law judge, Vince had an outburst because of the huge amount of stress due to the above condition and he even threatened to kill both the judge and the lawyer (Cropf, 2015).
The decision to deny Vince Rogov disability benefits was wrong since the patient has shown on different occasions that he had a mental condition that was worsening by the day. Recent threats made to Mike should serve as an indication that the condition is slowly worsening. Vince had severed ties with the family and had been involved in several violent episodes. Furthermore, he had already suffered from the condition for more than one year and thus it wouldd be better if the benefits were provided so that the patient could receive adequate medical care. If all of the above information is collected and analyzed, it shows that Vince is a step away from becoming mentally unstable.
The best decision that should be made by the disability advocate is to present the medical findings of the patient to the court during the appeal process. In addition, the disability advocate should look for a psychiatrist to examine the mental state of Vince. If the psychiatrist is not readily available to conduct the required tests, then the symptoms should be enlisted by witnesses in the court, who can provide testimonial evidence about the medical reports of Vince and, more specifically, describe the medical condition and state of the patient. Thus, the evidence can be confirmed by the military, with whom Vince was serving in the army in Iraq, and other members of the family. Moreover, the advocate should present the evidence of the recent altercation that happened to Vince (Cropf, 2015). From the above evidence, it is more likely to be proven that Vince indeed suffers from a mental disorder or is on the verge of a nervous breakdown and, therefore, should readily receive all disability benefits as enshrined in the law. Also, Mike Lawrence could choose to provide the case of Alexander v. Richardson (1971) where Alexander was provided with all monthly disability benefits after it was established that he had been indeed unable to engage in any meaningful activity for more than a year while still in the workplace (Cropf, 2015). In the above case, benefits were provided to an individual who was still enlisted as an employee though no medical test was conducted after his condition had worsened. Similarly, Vince is still working, though there is a high probability that he is mentally unstable.
There are special cases where people may qualify for disability benefits even though the condition has not been totally manifested in an individual. If these services are provided during such periods, then there is a high likelihood that the condition may be treated in the early stages. However, the above decision can only be made by structures that have been vested the right to do so by the law. Conversely, disability services aim at providing equal services to all individuals in the society, including mental cases exemplified in the above case. The earlier decision that was made was unfair to Vince since it failed to factor all pieces of evidence.